Author Archives: Dylan M. Bates

Prevention of the Status Quo & the Creation of Justice

Yesterday I was sitting with an old friend for brunch at La Madeleine, a French restaurant that is a cozy spot for a lazy and casual brunch. It was good to catch up with them over a caffeine-fueled conversation after having had my fill of eggs Benedict. As we were talking we began on the subject of international business, security, and the inclusion of parties for conflict transformation. Sitting across from each other we lived in two different worlds. I am a staunch advocate for law and order with a firm grounding in business and security; while she has worked most of her professional career in higher education focusing on work in positive psychology, somatic education, and social justice.

The conversation precipitated to a dilemma on inclusion. Let’s take a hypothetical in which you have a conflict-ridden society experiencing a breakdown in social services, government corruption, and economic recession. There is most likely even outbreaks of violence. An excellent case study on this could be recent developments in the politics of Egypt. The dilemma we discussed involved how to handle inclusion of stakeholders for the transformation of this society to more productive ends and a more inclusive forum for decision-making. I will begin with her argument followed by mine and a personal commentary on how I believe that process in a society is enabled to function.

Her argument was that inclusion is mandatory regardless of the stakeholders dynamics. Lets say that there are power disparities in which one person is a local official, or influential businessman, that exercises power through corruption, illicit business practices, or some other form of work that increases their worth. It does not matter if that person is sitting with a group of bodega-owners, bus drivers, or pilots, as that influential stakeholder is required to be with the group if there is to be a stakeholder consensus that creates a lasting peace in the community. Power disparities will need to be dealt with and facilitated accordingly. More was said, and I may not be doing her argument justice, but I believe that was the essence of her point.

My argument was that while inclusion is essential for a society to be well represented, you must take each situation as a circumstantial case. If that influential stakeholder is repressing the voices of several other individuals then that defeats the purpose of a consensus and in result democracy. If that stakeholder is responsible for intimidation, corruption, and a power imbalance then it is the obligation and responsibility of the members of society to fight for all voices to be heard.

So what does it mean to hold a consensus and create a representative democracy? That is a much larger question than I am able to answer, however there are a few key tenants that I believe are essential for a society to endure.The first is justice. The second is equity and a representative voice. The third is a social contract for the state to serve the will of the people’s interests and provide their civil functions. If a member is allowed to impose their will in such a way that is not in accordance with these pillars then it needs to be addressed. Justice must be administered through some form of redress, whether it be legally, politically, or socially. If there is a stakeholder that represses others’ ability to speak freely and exercise basic rights then there must be a change in that behavior. I do not believe that a genuine consensus can be created if they are allowed to take part unchallenged. In procedural conciliation you are taught to be aware of power differences due to its effect on the outcome of the negotiations. While there may be a short term agreement, if a member feels they do not have the ability to be heard or invested in the outcome it will surge in to resentment and conflict.

As I write this my thought process is trying to follow a practical procedure for a functioning society. Everyday people look to have trades, spend time with their loved ones, and fill what time they have left with hobbies or interests that they enjoy. Conflict arises when someone infringes on their business, basic liberties, or social rights. It can be resolved through active participation of such systems as forums, legislative bodies, or courts- and if deemed by a large enough voice a re-organization in politics or justice against those who perpetrated illicit actions.

 

It is certain, in any case, that ignorance, allied with power, is the most ferocious enemy justice can have.  – James A. Baldwin

-Dylan

Making Money: Where Do You Draw the Line Between Greed and Security?

Money is power. Money is the root of all evil. Disregard females, acquire currency. Only people who don’t have money say it doesn’t buy happiness. You hear these things a lot when people talk about getting money, acquiring dollars, you know the gist.

Money is important, but more than being important, money is neutral. This might seem like common sense to you, but it was mind-blowing to me. It is a medium of exchange for resources. Money can be under-utilized and very very abused. It just depends on who is using it. Our society employs different methods of acquiring currency based on supply and demand of skills and products. It’s the basis for all we talk about like business, capitalism, workforce, econoimcs, etc. Economics and workforce development look at the intricacies of one simple concept: the environment for people to find work. This video from Vice News is fantastic.

The reason it was so mind-blowing is how I’ve grown up. Living in a capitalist society has really affected me in how I think about money. It has really scarred me. The way people interact with each other is competitive and sometimes brutal. There can be quite a bit of unregulated and unequal distributions of wealth.

financial-wealth-scf-20131

I was raised in a lower middle class family and my dad was always at work. For several years before she passed away my mom worked full-time as well. We were not poor, but there were times we had to stretch money like it was a slinky toy and post-pone vacations yearly vacations. Throughout my childhood and adolescence I never did learn the value of money. I’m not talking about the price, but the value. That 3 dollars doesn’t just buy you a cup of coffee, it can be used to get 6 or 9 or 12 dollars. It’s a difference that those with money understand more than those without money.

All of my life I hated the game of business and making money. I was raised to believe it destroyed your soul. That if you spend your life in pursuit of money you would take advantage of anyone to make those dollars. And while it has sometimes been true, many times it isn’t. The dollar is neutral for better or worse. The power is backed by us, the people in society that use it. Problems come in when some people don’t understand or care about the use of money. That it represents resources and is the medium for exchange of goods and services.

I heard a great analogy of why those in poverty can be so terrible at managing their dollars if they first get them: imagine you are insanely thirsty, and have been your whole life. Then someone gives you a gallon of water, you’re going to drink it, right? You’re going to drink as much goddamn water as you can handle because you’ve been without it for so long. You’re not thinking about conserving it. You’re on a deficit and you don’t care if you drink it inefficiently. But then you’re out, what now? The problem is, wealthier families have a water tap. Whether they built it themselves or not is irrelevant in this discussion. They’re using it as leverage and as a tool to plan for their future survival.

Based on how much money you have is both your possession of resources and your ability to leverage capital. That becomes a problem when people need some just to survive, not just to play a game of higher-standard-of-living or use-my-capital-in-a-business-venture way. That collection of wealth hurts the distribution of those resources. It harms those who don’t know how to protect their basic livelihoods from it. The worker who lost his job and went hungry. Maybe you think it’s their own fault for not investing an interest in their financial future? Maybe. I am one of those people though, or I was one.

I’ve never really cared about financial security to be honest. My interests in life have been focused on helping others and trying to change the world for the better. This has come in the form of starting organizations, volunteering, mediating, etc. but one form it hasn’t come in is in making money. Sure, I work hard every day and I’ve gotten a paycheck since I was 16 but I wasn’t consumed by it. It was a way to have the means to continue my other work.  During my retail gigs I gave ridiculously great discounts and coupons to customers. I cared more about my employees’ well-being than making the bottom line. I don’t have regrets about this (I’m sure those companies aren’t a big fan) but it helps to show how I disregarded the value of money. I thought social change and money clashed against each other. As time goes on though I’m starting to learn that they are inextricably linked.

If you are looking to make peoples lives better and more productive they need to start with something. Across the spectrum this is a pretty well-established idea. Take a look at what Bernie Sander’s has based his platform on. As much as I hate to say it, even the Koch Brothers are creating education (granted with a large helping of their rugged individualism ideology). Creating educational opportunities and economic incentives is essentially teaching a man/woman to fish rather than dropping off a fish each day at their front door. If they have the knowledge, the tools, and some resources to start that’s really all anyone wants. Everyone wants a decent standard of living with some self respect.

So where do you draw the line between greed and security? That’s a hard question to answer. In fact, I don’t think there really is a line. I think that they are both part of the same human quality of self preservation. The conversation shouldn’t be about how much money should you make, it’s about how you live. It’s about how you are affecting the lives of others. It is making sure that you have enough food on the table and that your neighbor does too. I’m sure that can sound pretty socialist, or liberal, or communist, or however you’d like to go about it. What I mean by that though is that cooperation and group interest wins out over rugged individualism and competition. After all, anger, inequality, and revolution doesn’t happen in a bubble.

Money won’t create success, the freedom to make it will. –Nelson Mandela

-Dylan

Living in a World of Conflict (Without Being Hopeless)

Nobody enjoys seeing destructive conflict in the world. Whether it’s when bombs go off in Chad or a mass shooting in California. It can be shoving in the metro or a shouting match at the workplace. It’s a sad, terrible, and scary reality to know that these kinds of events happen on a regular basis throughout the world. The recent blow up of the gun control debate has shown that this year in the US alone there are more mass shootings than there have been days in 2015. That statistic should bring a scary, visceral feeling to all Americans. The problem is  that we can’t ignore it, but it’s a reality that most of us have a hard time digesting.

How can you process so much pain and hardship being experienced by so many people on a day to day basis?

Most people choose not to experience it. In this world life is short and most people find things that make them happy. They look to be fulfilled. Whether it is family, a career, or a hobby, most sane people don’t look for the pain of others. We have enough ourselves. Yet this is a dangerous way to live. “Ignorance is bliss” is very true-until it gets so bad that you don’t have a choice but to hear it. Being ignorant (or a less harsh word; being uninformed) perpetuates this system of violence we are so scared of knowing about. The systemic violence of minorities, the impoverished, and various other types of repression do not simply go away. They are deep-seated in society and take active change to rebuke. Our current trend of Islamophobia is just one of the plethora. This isn’t why I’m writing this post tonight though.

I’m writing this post because it’s important to understand that this violence and these injustices won’t go away overnight. They are integrated in to basic animal survival instincts and human nature. We are fighting a battle against ourselves. But that doesn’t mean it’s a battle that we can’t win. It’s not a futile battle in regards to human violence, it’s a promising battle in human conflict. Conflict is NOT always negative. It is how we handle conflict that is important.

The most important thing a person can do to stop violence is to listen. Our society is too social not to understand the other . By listening we begin to do that. We begin to better understand our similarities and the pain the other person is going through. We are all humans and have similar core values and needs.

Recently there has been a firestorm around the gun control debate. It is one regarding how best to protect the citizens of the United States. One is advocating for more personal use guns, and the other advocating stricter laws. Both are looking for the same purpose. Listening and understanding both sides can help navigate this issue. It helps push through the positioning and politics. The problem has come in though that at this point the government simply is not doing what it is supposed to be which is protecting its citizens from violence. If you can’t do that you have a failed state. In that situation it is completely rational to buy and own a gun for your own self defense. I think that’s where we’re at right now- a precipice- will the government be able to protect its own citizens from this violence? The problem that comes in is if they CAN’T, we have a whole lot more problems than the violence associated with people owning guns more freely. A failed state looks something like Afghanistan or Yemen. The mass shootings that have been happening have a lot of systemic violence associated with them. Terrorism comes from multiple root causes, both domestic and international, and really the only way to prevent it is strengthening civil society in as many aspects as possible.

My career is focused on conflict analysis and the violence that happens in the world. It takes a great toll on me many days. Sometimes I want nothing more than a tall drink. Or to move out and live in the mountains. Or become an accountant. But what keeps me functioning, passionate, and energized is that every bit of learning and listening I do helps me on the path to more constructive conflict. It helps me share my knowledge and play some role in how the world works. It helps me understand both my pain and others. It helps me understand how that impacts all of our actions.

If we remove ourselves from the destructive conflict in the world we are dooming ourselves to it. We are dooming ourselves to perpetuate it, and we will make decisions that exacerbate it. Bombs and discrimination only bring more of the same. We are all people that have basic needs such as a decent standard of living and self respect. If you start to look at these situations from that view you will make a much more positive change on the world, and you will end up being more fulfilled yourself. Take that last part  from me.

I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent. -Mahatma Gandhi

-Dylan

Our Modern State of Nature

 

What do we think of as the state of nature? Have you ever heard of it? Maybe it’s as primal as animals hunting for survival. Maybe it’s the drive to steal or murder. Or maybe when you call 911 and nothing happens.

Thomas Hobbes describes it as so, “the ‘natural condition of mankind’ is what would exist if there were no government, no civilization, no laws, and no common power to restrain human nature. The state of nature is a ‘war of all against all,’ in which human beings constantly seek to destroy each other in an incessant pursuit for power. Life in the state of nature is ‘nasty, brutish and short.'”

This is the basis for Hobbes’ Leviathan. In essence, an authoritarian regime that keeps human nature at bay to create a social contract for the betterment of mankind. I align myself to this view. I’m a Hobbesian at heart, but also a cautious optimist. I believe in the best of people, but prepare for the worst. I usually see that bad behavior as a reaction for self preservation or blow-back from personal suffering. That’s what I see in the world today. I see so much conflict and pain while also seeing a struggle for happiness.

The state of nature is always just at the cusp of our every day lives. In the last year or so I’ve been thinking of this topic almost daily. I think a lot of it has to do with the place I’m at in life coming out of college, entering the real world, etc. It’s been so frustrating to enter a place like Mason with so much understanding, communication, and acceptance and then immediately leave to a maelstrom of hard experiences.

When I came to Virginia I was in the midst of it already. I had a rough time in Oklahoma in just about every area of my life; academically, romantically, family-wise, financially, and politically. I worked hard and was dedicated to success in life. I was used to hardship. That’s all I knew. Community college was no different in that there was no real community. It only involved going to class and homework. But then Mason happened. I found my passion in conflict resolution and a community that was understanding and driven. It was probably the best experience of my life so far and has helped me grow in so many ways. There was a problem though; it wasn’t sustainable. It was a bubble.

No one lies to you that college isn’t the real world. They tell you all the time that you should take advantage of it while it lasts. But you don’t really understand. How could you? You are surrounded by thousands of people who think and act the same way. It IS real. But there’s a price tag each semester called tuition. That’s where it breaks down. You are literally paying for this experience, most of the time in loans for a date down the road. That’s where the difference between college and the real world lies. In college you can make mistakes and think whatever you’d like no matter how ludicrous it is. But outside of college everything has a price, even if it’s not in money. It’s competitive; there are a lot of people. It’s nasty, brutish, and sometimes short.

Herein lies our state of nature. Every day is a struggle for survival. Our whole society is built on the premise that it creates a better chance for our survival. That’s the premise of the Leviathan and the first natural law: self-preservation.

I think that’s where we get lost in it; how to go about self-preservation. Our knowledge has moved beyond massing resources for yourself or the mindset of “what is bad for you is good for me.” It turns out that what is good for you is also good for me. That cooperation and communication creates strength, progress, and productivity. All of those experiences in college weren’t worthless or unnecessary. They are the most valuable thing you have. They show what the world can be. That’s a fight for another day though, knowledge doesn’t change human nature.

My point is that our society is drenched in conflict. Whether it is the Paris attacks or structural violence. If a mother of four gets evicted from her apartment. If a kid has to sling drugs on a corner to eat. When someone gets shot because they had a nice house. When someone gets killed because they didn’t pay a debt. Or look at it even bigger–when a whole group of people are killed because another group thinks they were hurting their chances of survival. You can’t run away from it because it is people who cause it. But that doesn’t mean people are all bad, they do it because they want a decent life with some dignity. There are only so many resources and so many dangers. There’s no one to really blame in this situation.

Again, this isn’t always a bad thing. As you learn in S-CAR, conflict can be a force for good. It causes change, learning, and understanding. The key part is to transform a conflict from a violent, destructive one to something that creates a more positive and flourishing society. It’s a hard job but knowledge gets you there.

The modern state of nature uses our society. It’s a society that can institutionalize repression and discrimination. It’s a society that is made by people and represents the nature of people, both good and bad. The modern state of nature does not just break away to the root of ourselves in violence and pure animal instincts but uses societal tools and technologies for a new type of violence. You will be born in to this world assigned a value and a country. You will have obligations and contracts thrust upon you. All land and resources are owned and leased. Human nature thrives to fulfill its self interest to varying degrees.

This is what I believe. It’s how I feel. It’s how I think. It’s the result of what I see and what I’ve learned. It’s not a fairy tale story or Mad Max. It’s just what it is. There is the good and the bad. It’s a race for survival and happiness. To make purpose out of the time we have on this earth. In my mind we should carve out a space to do what makes us happy while creating a better place for others.

By peace we mean the capacity to transform conflicts with empathy, without violence, and creatively- a never-ending process.” – Johan Galtung

 

The World Was Always at War: From Beirut to Paris

The Paris attacks happened three days ago. In the span of that time the world was shocked, grieving, and now angry. Very angry.

The world is uniting once more under the banner “never forget.” Bombs are being dropped, intelligence is being gathered, and troops are being massed. All with the raging scream, “we will not forget.”

I’ll admit, I’m angry. I’m frustrated. I see the news and feel the pain. But I’ve been angry long before the Paris attacks. I was angry when a white boy prayed with a black church and murdered nine people. I was angry when I heard the stories of Garissa University and the gunmen who lined students up only to shoot them in the head. I was even angry back when the Islamic State was called the Islamic State of Iraq and knew friends who were shot in the streets.

I’ve been angry and frustrated for a long time.

The Paris attacks, as well as the Beirut bombings are a terrible tragedy. Innocent lives were brutally ended. I understand those who call for revenge and for the obliteration of those who caused this. I want to see every person who has committed atrocities tried for their crimes. But to only send bombs and troops to a place that is already destroyed by conflict and intervention is not only naive, it’s a disaster. That makes it seem like this is an anomaly committed by psychopaths for no reason other than it serves their global jihad. It’s just not the truth. It wasn’t an anomaly, it was inevitable.

The storm around Daesh has been raging for several years. It stems from colonial powers and grew during the 2003 invasion of Iraq. There’s a lot to this story and background but I don’t feel like writing about it right now. Let me know if you’d like to talk about it, I enjoy a good conversation. Essentially they are a product of their environment and grew through popular support and a vacuum of a failed state. Its ideology is based in security through extremism.

It’s no particularly unique story though. Each generation has had a conflict with similar roots. Some countries strong arm other countries. Some try to dominate them. It’s how states operate. This leads to repression in one way or another. The people in those countries don’t like it. They rebel. It goes back to the very beginning when one group of people tried to take resources from another group.

I think that’s what scares people the most. There is so much conflict and pain in the world that they want to be removed from it. Especially in the western world we want to believe this kind of violence doesn’t happen. Except it does happen, both domestic and foreign. There are mass shootings everyday and structural violence is just an everyday thing. We have built whole societies into fortresses from the rest of the world. We have had a huge part in creating the rest of the world. The western world has molded much the Middle East, Africa, Latin America and some of Asia. But it’s not possible to create barriers from the rest of the world while simultaneously using it. We are all connected in this world. Violence is a byproduct of how our societies are functioning. You can’t have the shining city upon a hill without keeping the floodgates at bay. We reap what we sow. We are linked to our actions.

I’m not saying this is a world engulfed in chaos and destruction. I’m also not saying that France deserved to have over 120 innocent people murdered or that the Beirut bombings are just the price of society.

What I am saying is that we should not be surprised that they happened. The world was always at war. France, the US, and the rest of the coalition have been on daily bombing campaigns. Whole armies are fighting in places from Yemen to Rwanda. There is racism and prejudice that kills scores every day. Poverty overthrows states. There is oppression in all corners of the world. Remember, two of the attackers were French.

My message is that violence does not cure violence. Extremism does not cure extremism. It creates it. It perpetuates it. If you want to stop another mass shooting you don’t call for extermination. You look at why it happened. You look at what drove someone to kill another human being in cold blood. No one comes out of the womb intent to end someone else’s life. To hold a pistol to their forehead and pull the trigger. They want exactly what you want; basic human dignity and a decent livelihood. That’s something not many people have anymore. If you want to stop Daesh stop their support. Improve their society.

That’s why I’m angry and frustrated.

“If you believe that the killing of innocent people is right, then you are not part of my future.” – King Abdullah II

-Dylan

White Privilege

If you are white you’ve got privilege. It’s just that simple. There are no if’s, and’s, or but’s to it. But that doesn’t mean you’re a racist or that you’re dressed in a white hood carrying a flaming torch screaming for the rebirth of the Third Reich. It’s how you keep yourself aware of that privilege that is critical.

I’m a white male and I’ve got a lot of privilege. I’ve got certain systemic and cultural advantages over others. When I turn in job applications I get higher stats of success. When I’m walking down the street I’m less likely to get stopped by a police officer. When I go in to a restaurant the staff will automatically address me as the head of the group. I can get a cab every time. My small loan application will have a higher chance for approval.

These are just a few of the micro-aggression’s that others face.

It’s taken me a few years to understand how the world works like this. I couldn’t see or feel it. The gender or color of my skin doesn’t make me any more special than anyone else. Since I knew this I felt this was what was most critical. If I wasn’t acting racist, if I wasn’t putting others down, then racism doesn’t exist. 

Wrong.

The true racists of the world aren’t doing the most damage for equality and privilege, it’s the average person who doesn’t realize they’re perpetuating a system. It’s a system that follows the examples I put up above. It’s when someone gets stopped for stealing for no reason other than being black.

My wake up call came when I moved to Washington, DC. When I realized just how white washed things were where I grew up. Then I lived in to a house of about eight guys, most of whom were black. I also had my two sisters, one of whom is an avid social justice advocate. I can say there were more than just a few heated discussions. Most of which I just “didn’t get” why she was so mad. Why was she so mad that I didn’t think the N-word was a big deal? To me it only had power if you gave it power. Racism was so last generation. We’re the generation that “doesn’t see color.”

The problem is that even IF we’re the generation that doesn’t have racism we still have to deal with the generations that did (which our generation does have racism. A lot of it.) Slavery was around for 250 years and the Civil Rights Movement only happened in the 1960’s. There’s a lot of racism and a lot of it is systemic. Sorry old self, the “it only has power if you give it power” argument doesn’t work. I wish it did.

Then there is hearing stories of the discrimination. I sometimes became the token white friend when we went out so that there wouldn’t be any issues with clerks at the liquor store, bouncers, or cops. That was real. One day one of my roommates was coming out of the liquor store after having bought a bottle and cops stopped him. They told him to get on the ground because they thought he’d stolen something in his backpack. He hadn’t, he was a good guy. Later when he told me this I was shocked and angry. He and the rest of my roommates just shrugged and said it happens.

My experiences just got more dramatic as I saw more widespread and systemic poverty, violence, and police brutality in the worst areas of DC and Baltimore. Just look at the Baltimore riots as an example. If you think that that level of despair is something new you’ll be in for a shock. That level of repression doesn’t happen out of thin air. It happens through structural violence and discrimination of whole communities. It happens through unintentional bias and the complacency of the status quo.

Next came the white guilt. I think this is where a lot of people have trouble. Either you don’t know how to handle unintentionally being part of such a devastating system or you refuse to accept it. A lot of people do that. A lot of people say “I’ve had struggles too, bro.” Yeah, me too. We all have, but minorities get it worse. Whether it’s a little or a lot.

A great analogy I heard for privilege is that you are in a classroom with other students. There’s a wastebasket you are all shooting at with paper balls to try and make it in. The ones seated at the front have an easier time trying to make it in and therefore have the most privilege. The ones shooting from the back of the room have the least chance and therefore the least privilege. Here’s a great video between Jon Stewart and Bill O’Reilly too:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/10/16/bill_oreilly_vs_jon_stewart_on_white_privilege.html

All being said and done that doesn’t mean things are hopeless. You shouldn’t give up and donate everything just because you’re white or a male. It’s about creating a fair chance. It’s about being aware.

Check your privilege. Maybe you’ve heard that term before. It means that something you are saying/doing is conveying your privilege in a detrimental way. Maybe you are overpowering others from really being heard in a conversation. Maybe you are adding assumptions based on your own privileged experiences. Maybe you are discounting the discriminatory experiences of others because you’ve never had them. It’s powerful because that is a powerful tool in fighting discrimination as a person of privilege.

I began hearing it at the start of the Black Lives Matter movement. I went to a few training’s and heard a lot of new things. A lot of it made me uncomfortable and that’s the point. This is something I am constantly fighting. I have the privilege to stop talking about discrimination and leave the fight anytime I please. Do I no longer want to deal with racism? I’m not really affected by it as a person of privilege, so I will simply pretend it doesn’t exist. That is how these systems survive.

A part of this is about respecting spaces. Take this story for example. This was a hard concept for me to understand and I’m still not all the way there.

Now imagine you are riding the DC metro green line from Anacostia up through DC. Black students get on from being out of school and are talkative and rowdy. As the train goes it begins hitting downtown and the train gets noticeably more white. The students start getting very quiet and grouping up in to small clusters. Halfway through the train line they are the minority and are talking quietly among themselves. The train gets farther north and more people of color get on. The students get louder once again. This happens every day.

This story was told to me by a Black Lives Matter activist about the power of spaces. There are very few spaces in this country that aren’t influenced by the majority. It stifles voices and their power to fight. This isn’t our fight, it’s theirs.

Anyways, I’m by no means an authoritative figure on social justice and it’s something I fight with every day. These are a few of the impactful experiences I’ve had that I wanted to write down.

“You don’t stick a knife in a man’s back nine inches and then pull it out six inches and say you’re making progress … No matter how much respect, no matter how much recognition, whites show towards me, as far as I am concerned, as long as it is not shown to everyone of our people in this country, it doesn’t exist for me.”   -Malcom X

-Dylan

Politics from DC to Oklahoma

The election cycle for the 2016 Presidential Election is underway and beginning to rev up to full speed. It started off in almost polar ways for Republicans and Democrats: the Republic candidates being a huge pool of practical unknowns, and the Democrats with their few and far between candidates behind the almost unanimous front-runner Hillary Clinton.

Now we’ve got the Republican candidate pool thinning with two radicals at the front: Donald Trump, self-proclaimed aficionado at everything, business man, and expert at being angry; and Ben Carson, neurosurgeon, with his quiet insanity and expertise in…what Jews should have done during the Holocaust. The Democratic side now is between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, the former a career politician who aspires to be relevant and the latter a self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist, a radical to most, and emotionally stable to few. Okay maybe those descriptions are a little harsh. But this is going to be such a blast.

Not everyone in the US is participating the same way though. I see it every day on my news feed on Facebook. I took a screenshot of two different posts I saw by friends who are Democrats:

Oklahoma

Oklahoma-politics

Washington, DC

dc-politics

Talk about a difference in positions. Call me biased, but when I read the Oklahoma post I went “what the fuck.” Maybe it’s the conflict resolution major in me that got mad. The irony of starting conflict because of conflict isn’t lost on me either (#conflictproblems). That post is screaming positioning, mis-communication, bias, lack of other viewpoints,  and a basic lack of information. Yet I see that kind of post every single day.

Growing up in Oklahoma there wasn’t much focus on learning and understanding others. You don’t have a diverse population or centers of education and decision-making. In Washington, DC you get something that you rarely get across the nation: access and information. No, it’s about community and values. Honestly that’s what I miss most about it. It’s a place that you say hi to strangers walking down the street and starting a conversation with “how are you?”

Community and values came with the hitch that there’s not a whole lot of space for facts and dialogue. It’s just how it is. It’s just how it is because incomes are low and not much happens there. It’s just how it is because relationships are really all you’ve got. You’ve got your friends and family that you’ll know and be with you your whole life. You were raised a certain way and your friends think a certain way. Not much changes, so why should your views change? Here’s an article I read about a guy from Oklahoma who changed from being a Republican:

http://nondoc.com/2015/11/03/i-realized-i-am-not-a-republican-anymore/

I could relate to all of that. I can relate to growing up in a state where you’re guaranteed to get elected by using the three G’s: God, Guns, and no Gays. A state that believes in “traditional” values. To someone looking in to this kind of place it might seem illogical and irrational. Yeah, you’re right it is in a lot of ways. But in a lot of ways it isn’t. In a place where all you’ve really got are your values and traditions they become exponentially more important. They become your identity. Oklahoman’s are in a constant identity crisis.

By that standard it’s not that surprising Trump’s platform and slogan “Make America Great Again” is getting so much support. In a time where radical views get support from a majority that are sick and tired of being ignored. When you see a Facebook post slurring one candidate and idealizing another. It creates radical and one-sided ideals that are a part of a persons identity. It’s not about the candidate. It’s not even about the issues. It’s about how the person views the world and how the world views them. You break it down in to how that person wants to be seen and how that person wants to be treated.

In the end I feel like I’m in between two worlds. A place where neither world really understands the other. I think realizing that disparity is a really important lesson to know. We’ll see how it works out for people.

-Dylan